Skip to content

Series solutions near an irregular singular point

We study the second–order linear ODE

L[w]≡w′′(z)+p(z)w′(z)+q(z)w(z)=0,L[w]\equiv w''(z)+p(z)w'(z)+q(z)w(z)=0,

where p(z)p(z) and q(z)q(z) are meromorphic. Our goal is to understand how to construct series solutions near an irregular singular point, with particular emphasis on z=∞z=\infty.

At a regular singular point, Frobenius theory gives convergent power series. At an irregular singular point:

  • one still has Frobenius–type formal series, but they typically diverge;
  • the leading behaviour usually involves an exponential factor eQ(z)e^{Q(z)};
  • in some cases, fractional powers of zz enter after a ramified change of variables.

This note introduces these ideas through formal, normal, and subnormal solutions.


1. Setup and formal Frobenius–type series

Section titled “1. Setup and formal Frobenius–type series”

We focus on z=∞z=\infty and assume that p(z)p(z) and q(z)q(z) are meromorphic there. Write their Laurent expansions as

p(z)=zn1(a0+a1z+a2z2+⋯ )=∑ν=0∞aνzn1−ν,p(z)=z^{n_1}\Bigl(a_0+\frac{a_1}{z}+\frac{a_2}{z^2}+\cdots\Bigr) =\sum_{\nu=0}^\infty a_\nu z^{n_1-\nu}, q(z)=zn2(b0+b1z+b2z2+⋯ )=∑ν=0∞bνzn2−ν,q(z)=z^{n_2}\Bigl(b_0+\frac{b_1}{z}+\frac{b_2}{z^2}+\cdots\Bigr) =\sum_{\nu=0}^\infty b_\nu z^{n_2-\nu},

with integers n1,n2n_1,n_2 and a0,b0a_0,b_0 not both zero (unless p≡0p\equiv0 or q≡0q\equiv0).

Recall that:

  • If p(z)=O(z−1)p(z)=O(z^{-1}) and q(z)=O(z−2)q(z)=O(z^{-2}) as z→∞z\to\infty, then ∞\infty is an ordinary or regular singular point.
  • If at least one of n1>−1,n2>−2n_1>-1,\qquad n_2>-2 holds, the point z=∞z=\infty is an irregular singular point of polar type. This is the case we study.

We first try a Frobenius–type ansatz

w(z)=zρ∑k=0∞ckz−k,c0≠0.w(z)=z^\rho\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k z^{-k},\qquad c_0\neq0.

Differentiate:

w′(z)=zρ−1∑k=0∞ck(ρ−k)z−k,w′′(z)=zρ−2∑k=0∞ck(ρ−k)(ρ−k−1)z−k.w'(z)=z^{\rho-1}\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k(\rho-k)z^{-k},\qquad w''(z)=z^{\rho-2}\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k(\rho-k)(\rho-k-1)z^{-k}.

Substitute into L[w]=0L[w]=0 and factor out zρz^\rho:

0=L[w]=zρ{∑k=0∞ck(ρ−k)(ρ−k−1)z−k−2+[∑ℓ=0∞aℓzn1−ℓ][∑k=0∞ck(ρ−k)z−k−1]+[∑ν=0∞bνzn2−ν][∑k=0∞ckz−k]}.\begin{aligned} 0&=L[w] \\ &=z^\rho\Biggl\{ \sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k(\rho-k)(\rho-k-1) z^{-k-2} +\Bigl[\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty a_\ell z^{n_1-\ell}\Bigr] \Bigl[\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k(\rho-k)z^{-k-1}\Bigr] \\ &\qquad\qquad +\Bigl[\sum_{\nu=0}^\infty b_\nu z^{n_2-\nu}\Bigr] \Bigl[\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k z^{-k}\Bigr] \Biggr\}. \end{aligned}

Inside the braces we have a formal Laurent series in integer powers of zz. For ww to be a formal solution, the coefficient of each power of zz must vanish.

The highest powers come from:

  • the w′′w'' term: at most z−2z^{-2};
  • the pw′p w' term: from a0c0(ρ)zn1−1a_0 c_0(\rho) z^{n_1-1};
  • the qwq w term: from b0c0zn2b_0 c_0 z^{n_2}.

If n2≥n1n_2\ge n_1, then zn2z^{n_2} is the highest power and its coefficient is b0c0≠0b_0 c_0\neq0, so no such formal series exists.

Thus a necessary condition for a Frobenius–type formal solution is

n1>n2.n_1>n_2.

If p≡0p\equiv0 (so all aν=0a_\nu=0), then zn2z^{n_2} is again the highest power with coefficient b0c0b_0c_0, and the ansatz fails unless q≡0q\equiv0. In that sense the “order” of pp is −∞-\infty, and the condition n1>n2n_1>n_2 still fails.

Assume from now on that n1>n2n_1>n_2 and a0≠0a_0\neq0. The dominant power in the curly bracket is then zn1−1z^{n_1-1}. Two subcases occur.

  1. n1>n2+1n_1>n_2+1.
    The exponent n1−1n_1-1 is strictly larger than n2n_2, so only the pw′p w' term contributes to this power. Its coefficient is a0c0ρa_0 c_0 \rho, so

    ρ=0.\rho=0.
  2. n1=n2+1n_1=n_2+1.
    Now pw′p w' and qwq w both contribute to the power zn2z^{n_2}, giving coefficient c0(a0ρ+b0)c_0(a_0\rho+b_0). Hence

    a0ρ+b0=0⇒ρ=−b0a0.a_0\rho+b_0=0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \rho=-\frac{b_0}{a_0}.

This “indicial equation” is linear in ρ\rho, in contrast with the quadratic indicial equation at a regular singular point.

Once ρ\rho is fixed, one equates the coefficients of the lower powers of zz to zero, obtaining a linear recurrence that determines c1,c2,…c_1,c_2,\dots uniquely in terms of the free parameter c0c_0. The resulting series is a formal Frobenius–type solution at z=∞z=\infty.

For an irregular singular point, the coefficients ckc_k typically grow faster than k!k!, so the series ∑k≥0ckz−k\sum_{k\ge0}c_k z^{-k} diverges for every finite zz. However it still carries information:

A formal series

w(z)∼zρ∑k=0∞ckz−k(z→∞)w(z)\sim z^\rho\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k z^{-k}\qquad (z\to\infty)

is an asymptotic expansion of a genuine solution if, for each fixed NN,

w(z)−zρ∑k=0N−1ckz−k=O(zρ−N)as z→∞w(z)-z^\rho\sum_{k=0}^{N-1}c_k z^{-k} = O(z^{\rho-N}) \quad \text{as } z\to\infty

in some sector of the complex plane.

Truncating the divergent series after finitely many terms then provides good approximations for large ∣z∣\lvert z\rvert. Stokes phenomena arise as one crosses rays where exponentially small corrections switch on and off.


When the necessary condition n1>n2n_1>n_2 fails (for example if p≡0p\equiv0 and qq grows at infinity), Frobenius–type series of the form zρ∑ckz−kz^\rho\sum c_k z^{-k} do not exist. In many such situations solutions have the more general form

w(z)=eQ(z)zρ∑k=0∞ckz−k,w(z)=e^{Q(z)}z^\rho\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k z^{-k},

where the exponential factor contains a polynomial Q(z)Q(z) that captures the dominant growth or decay.

Consider the first–order equation

w′(z)+R(z)w(z)=0.w'(z)+R(z)w(z)=0.

If R(z)→0R(z)\to0 as z→∞z\to\infty, then −w′/w=R(z)-w'/w=R(z) has only negative powers in its Laurent expansion, and ww can admit a Frobenius–type expansion.

If instead R(z)R(z) has a polynomial part,

R(z)=Aszs+As−1zs−1+⋯+A1z+A0+∑ℓ≥1aℓz−ℓ,s≥0, As≠0,R(z)=A_s z^s + A_{s-1}z^{s-1}+\cdots + A_1 z + A_0 +\sum_{\ell\ge1}a_\ell z^{-\ell}, \qquad s\ge0,\ A_s\ne0,

then

w(z)=Cexp⁡(−∫zR(ζ) dζ).w(z)=C\exp\Bigl(-\int^z R(\zeta)\,d\zeta\Bigr).

Splitting the integral into its polynomial and decaying parts, we obtain

w(z)=C eQ(z) zρ ψ(z),w(z) =C\,e^{Q(z)}\,z^\rho\,\psi(z),

with

  • Q(z)Q(z) a polynomial (coming from the integral of the polynomial part of R(z)R(z)),
  • ρ\rho determined by the coefficient of z−1z^{-1} in R(z)R(z),
  • ψ(z)=exp⁡{negative powers of z}=∑k≥0ckz−k\psi(z)=\exp\{\text{negative powers of }z\} =\sum_{k\ge0}c_k z^{-k}, a Frobenius–type series.

This motivates the following definition.

Normal solution (at z=∞z=\infty).
A solution of a linear ODE is called normal if it can be written as

w(z)=eQ(z)zρ∑k=0∞ckz−k,c0≠0,w(z)=e^{Q(z)}z^\rho\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k z^{-k},\qquad c_0\neq0,

where Q(z)Q(z) is a (non‑constant) polynomial.

2.2 Reduction for second–order equations

Section titled “2.2 Reduction for second–order equations”

For the second–order equation

w′′(z)+p(z)w′(z)+q(z)w(z)=0,w''(z)+p(z)w'(z)+q(z)w(z)=0,

we look for a normal solution by setting

w(z)=eQ(z)v(z),Q(z) polynomial.w(z)=e^{Q(z)}v(z),\qquad Q(z)\ \text{polynomial}.

Compute

w′=eQ(v′+Q′v),w′′=eQ(v′′+2Q′v′+Q′′v+(Q′)2v).w'=e^{Q}(v'+Q'v),\qquad w''=e^{Q}\bigl(v''+2Q'v'+Q''v+(Q')^2v\bigr).

Substituting into the ODE and cancelling the common factor eQe^{Q} we get an equation for vv:

v′′+p∗(z)v′+q∗(z)v=0,v''+p^*(z)v'+q^*(z)v=0,

with modified coefficients

p∗(z)=p(z)+2Q′(z),q∗(z)=q(z)+p(z)Q′(z)+Q′′(z)+[Q′(z)]2.p^*(z)=p(z)+2Q'(z),\qquad q^*(z)=q(z)+p(z)Q'(z)+Q''(z)+[Q'(z)]^2.

We now apply the formal Frobenius analysis of Section 1 to this transformed equation. In particular:

  • expand p∗,q∗p^*,q^* in Laurent series at infinity,
  • let n~1,n~2\tilde n_1,\tilde n_2 be their orders,
  • demand n~1>n~2\tilde n_1>\tilde n_2 so that a Frobenius–type formal series for vv can exist.

This requirement determines the degree and coefficients of QQ. Once QQ is fixed, the exponent ρ\rho and the coefficients ckc_k in v(z)=zρ∑ckz−kv(z)=z^\rho\sum c_k z^{-k} follow from the same recurrence process as before.

From the viewpoint of the Riccati equation for w′/ww'/w, choosing Q(z)Q(z) amounts to approximating the “logarithmic derivative” by a polynomial and removing that leading behaviour.


Consider the ODE

ψ′′(x)+(λ−α2x2)ψ(x)=0,α>0,\psi''(x)+\bigl(\lambda-\alpha^2 x^2\bigr)\psi(x)=0, \qquad \alpha>0,

the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator (after rescaling). Here p(x)≡0p(x)\equiv0, and

q(x)=λ−α2x2∼−α2x2(x→∞).q(x)=\lambda-\alpha^2x^2\sim -\alpha^2x^2\quad(x\to\infty).

Because p≡0p\equiv0, the necessary condition n1>n2n_1>n_2 for a Frobenius–type series fails: there is no formal solution of the simple form xρ∑ckx−kx^\rho\sum c_k x^{-k}. We therefore seek a normal solution.

Set

ψ(x)=eQ(x)v(x).\psi(x)=e^{Q(x)}v(x).

As above, the transformed equation for vv is

v′′(x)+p∗(x)v′(x)+q∗(x)v(x)=0,v''(x)+p^*(x)v'(x)+q^*(x)v(x)=0,

with

p∗(x)=2Q′(x),q∗(x)=λ−α2x2+Q′′(x)+[Q′(x)]2.p^*(x)=2Q'(x),\qquad q^*(x)=\lambda-\alpha^2x^2+Q''(x)+[Q'(x)]^2.

We want the order of p∗p^* at infinity to be higher than that of q∗q^*. Since q∗q^* contains [Q′(x)]2[Q'(x)]^2, Q′(x)Q'(x) must be at most linear; otherwise [Q′]2[Q']^2 would dominate and make the order of q∗q^* too large. So try

Q(x)=a1x+a2x2.Q(x)=a_1x+a_2x^2.

Then

Q′(x)=a1+2a2x,Q′′(x)=2a2,Q'(x)=a_1+2a_2x,\qquad Q''(x)=2a_2, p∗(x)=2(a1+2a2x),p^*(x)=2(a_1+2a_2x), q∗(x)=λ−α2x2+2a2+(a1+2a2x)2=λ+2a2+a12+4a1a2x+(−α2+4a22)x2.q^*(x)=\lambda-\alpha^2x^2+2a_2+(a_1+2a_2x)^2 =\lambda+2a_2+a_1^2+4a_1a_2x+(-\alpha^2+4a_2^2)x^2.

For p∗p^* to have strictly higher order than q∗q^*, the coefficients of x2x^2 and xx in q∗q^* must vanish:

4a22−α2=0,4a1a2=0.4a_2^2-\alpha^2=0,\qquad 4a_1a_2=0.

Thus

a2=±α2,a1=0,a_2=\pm\frac{\alpha}{2},\qquad a_1=0,

and we can take

Q(x)=±αx22.Q(x)=\pm\frac{\alpha x^2}{2}.

The corresponding transformed equation is

v′′(x)±2αx v′(x)+(λ±α)v(x)=0.v''(x)\pm2\alpha x\,v'(x)+(\lambda\pm\alpha)v(x)=0.

For physical applications we are interested in solutions decaying at ∣x∣→∞\lvert x\rvert\to\infty. This corresponds to

Q(x)=−αx22,Q(x)=-\frac{\alpha x^2}{2},

for which

p∗(x)=−2αx,q∗(x)=λ−α,p^*(x)=-2\alpha x,\qquad q^*(x)=\lambda-\alpha,

and

v′′(x)−2αx v′(x)+(λ−α)v(x)=0.v''(x)-2\alpha x\,v'(x)+(\lambda-\alpha)v(x)=0.

This is the Hermite (parabolic cylinder) equation.

Seek a Frobenius–type series

v(x)=xρ∑k=0∞ckx−k,c0≠0.v(x)=x^\rho\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k x^{-k},\qquad c_0\neq0.

Substituting into the Hermite equation and comparing coefficients gives:

  • the exponent ρ=λ−α2α;\rho=\frac{\lambda-\alpha}{2\alpha};
  • all odd coefficients vanish, c2k+1=0c_{2k+1}=0;
  • the even coefficients satisfy the recurrence c2k+2=(ρ−2k)(ρ−2k−1)4α(k+1) c2k,k=0,1,2,…c_{2k+2} =\frac{(\rho-2k)(\rho-2k-1)}{4\alpha(k+1)}\,c_{2k}, \qquad k=0,1,2,\ldots

From this recurrence one can check that c2kc_{2k} grows roughly like (2k)!(2k)!, so the series ∑c2kx−2k\sum c_{2k}x^{-2k} diverges for all finite xx. Nevertheless

ψ(x)∼e−αx2/2 xρ∑k=0∞c2kx−2k(x→∞)\psi(x)\sim e^{-\alpha x^2/2}\,x^\rho \sum_{k=0}^\infty c_{2k}x^{-2k} \quad (x\to\infty)

is an asymptotic expansion of a true solution that decays along suitable rays in the complex plane.

3.3 Terminating series and Hermite polynomials

Section titled “3.3 Terminating series and Hermite polynomials”

If

ρ=n∈{0,1,2,… },equivalently λ=α(2n+1),\rho=n\in\{0,1,2,\dots\}, \quad\text{equivalently } \lambda=\alpha(2n+1),

then for some kk the factor (ρ−2k)(\rho-2k) in the recurrence vanishes, and the series terminates: c2k′=0c_{2k'}=0 for all k′>kk'>k. The solution v(x)v(x) becomes a polynomial of degree nn.

Writing ξ=α x\xi=\sqrt{\alpha}\,x, these polynomials are proportional to the standard Hermite polynomials Hn(ξ)H_n(\xi), defined by, e.g.,

Hn(ξ)=(2ξ)n−n(n−1)1!(2ξ)n−2+n(n−1)(n−2)(n−3)2!(2ξ)n−4−⋯ .H_n(\xi) =(2\xi)^n-\frac{n(n-1)}{1!}(2\xi)^{n-2} +\frac{n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)}{2!}(2\xi)^{n-4}-\cdots.

Thus for the discrete values λ=α(2n+1)\lambda=\alpha(2n+1) we obtain global, square-integrable solutions

ψn(x)=e−αx2/2Hn(α x),\psi_n(x)=e^{-\alpha x^2/2}H_n(\sqrt{\alpha}\,x),

the familiar eigenfunctions of the quantum harmonic oscillator. In this case the normal solution is not just asymptotic but given by a convergent finite series.


Sometimes no polynomial Q(z)Q(z) makes the transformed coefficients p∗(z),q∗(z)p^*(z),q^*(z) satisfy the condition needed for a Frobenius–type series. However, an algebraic change of variables can improve the situation.

A typical structure is:

  • after a ramified substitution z=ζsz=\zeta^s with s∈Ns\in\mathbb N, the transformed equation in ζ\zeta admits a normal solution;
  • when expressed back in the original variable zz, the solution involves exponentials and series in fractional powers of zz.

Subnormal solution.
A solution of w′′+pw′+qw=0w''+pw'+qw=0 is called subnormal of order ss if, after the change of variable z=ζsz=\zeta^s, it becomes a normal solution in the variable ζ\zeta.

Consider

w′′(z)+q(z)w(z)=0,w''(z)+q(z)w(z)=0,

with

q(z)=∑ℓ=1∞bℓz−ℓ,b1≠0.q(z)=\sum_{\ell=1}^\infty b_\ell z^{-\ell}, \qquad b_1\neq0.

Here p(z)≡0p(z)\equiv0 and q(z)q(z) decays like b1/zb_1/z. One checks that no choice of polynomial Q(z)Q(z) yields a normal solution directly.

Introduce the substitution z=ζ2z=\zeta^2 (so ζ=z1/2\zeta=z^{1/2}). Using ddz=12ζddζ\dfrac{d}{dz}=\dfrac{1}{2\zeta}\dfrac{d}{d\zeta} and

d2dz2=14ζ2d2dζ2−14ζ3ddζ,\frac{d^2}{dz^2} =\frac{1}{4\zeta^2}\frac{d^2}{d\zeta^2} -\frac{1}{4\zeta^3}\frac{d}{d\zeta},

the equation becomes

d2wdζ2−1ζdwdζ+4ζ2q(ζ2)w=0.\frac{d^2w}{d\zeta^2} - \frac1{\zeta}\frac{dw}{d\zeta} +4\zeta^2 q(\zeta^2) w =0.

Now

4ζ2q(ζ2)=4b1+O(ζ−2),4\zeta^2 q(\zeta^2)=4b_1+O(\zeta^{-2}),

and the coefficient of w′w' is −1/ζ-1/\zeta, whose order at infinity is higher than that of 4ζ2q(ζ2)4\zeta^2 q(\zeta^2). The transformed equation therefore does admit a normal solution of the form

w(ζ)=exp⁡ ⁣(±−b1 ζ) ζρ∑k=0∞ckζ−k,w(\zeta) =\exp\!\bigl(\pm\sqrt{-b_1}\,\zeta\bigr)\, \zeta^\rho\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k \zeta^{-k},

for some exponent ρ\rho and coefficients ckc_k.

Returning to z=ζ2z=\zeta^2 gives the subnormal solution

w(z)=exp⁡ ⁣(±−b1 z1/2) z1/4∑k=0∞ckz−k/2.w(z) =\exp\!\bigl(\pm\sqrt{-b_1}\,z^{1/2}\bigr)\, z^{1/4}\sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k z^{-k/2}.

The presence of e±−b1 z1/2e^{\pm\sqrt{-b_1}\,z^{1/2}} and the series in half-integer powers of zz are characteristic of a subnormal solution of order 2.


For the second–order ODE w′′+pw′+qw=0w''+pw'+qw=0 at an irregular singular point of polar type (say z=∞z=\infty):

  • A Frobenius–type formal series w(z)=zρ∑ckz−kw(z)=z^\rho\sum c_k z^{-k} can exist only if the order of p(z)p(z) at infinity exceeds that of q(z)q(z). When it exists, the exponent ρ\rho is determined by a linear indicial equation and the coefficients ckc_k follow from a recurrence. The series usually diverges and must be interpreted asymptotically.

  • When this condition fails, one looks for normal solutions w(z)=eQ(z)zρ∑ckz−kw(z)=e^{Q(z)}z^\rho\sum c_k z^{-k} with a polynomial Q(z)Q(z) chosen so that the transformed equation for v=e−Qwv=e^{-Q}w does admit a Frobenius–type series. The Weber/Hermite equation is a canonical example, where Q(x)=±αx2/2Q(x)=\pm\alpha x^2/2.

  • In more complicated cases, an algebraic change of variables z=ζsz=\zeta^s can create a normal solution in ζ\zeta. The resulting solutions in the original variable are subnormal, involving exponentials and series in fractional powers of zz.

These constructions give a systematic way to understand the local structure of solutions near irregular singular points and provide the starting point for global questions such as Stokes phenomena, connection formulae, and quantisation conditions in quantum mechanics.